-By A Special Correspondent
(Lanka-e-News -21.Jan.2025, 10.25 PM) The appointment of former Senior DIG Lalinda Ranaweera to a coordinating position within Sri Lanka’s Ministry of Public Security under the National People’s Power (NPP) government has raised more than a few eyebrows. While such a move might seem innocuous at first glance, those familiar with Ranaweera’s history cannot ignore the role he played—or allegedly played—in the investigation of the tragic and highly controversial death of rugby star Wasim Thajudeen.
Ranaweera's now-infamous statement that Thajudeen died in a car crash, rather than being the victim of a calculated murder, has become a cornerstone of what many believe was a deliberate cover-up. This has led to growing concerns over his appointment, sparking heated debate on whether his new position represents a fresh start or a continuation of old networks protecting powerful figures.
For those unfamiliar with the case, Wasim Thajudeen’s death in 2012 was initially ruled a car accident. The narrative, presented with alarming swiftness, painted a picture of reckless driving that ended tragically. But questions began to arise almost immediately.
Burn marks on Thajudeen’s body, evidence of blunt force trauma, and missing CCTV footage pointed to foul play. Investigative journalists, whistleblowers, and activists linked the crime to individuals allegedly close to the Rajapaksa family, specifically Yoshitha Rajapaksa, son of then-President Mahinda Rajapaksa.
Years later, the case was reopened, revealing disturbing details that pointed to a calculated murder and subsequent cover-up. Among those implicated in obstructing justice was Lalinda Ranaweera, then a Senior DIG, who had been instrumental in shaping the initial narrative of a car crash.
Ranaweera’s own Official Vehicle Book (OVB) testimony played a critical role in supporting the car crash theory. In his statement, he dismissed suggestions of murder, calling the death a tragic accident.
But was this a genuine belief, a result of negligence, or something more sinister? Critics argue that Ranaweera’s actions fit neatly into a broader pattern of state-sponsored cover-ups during the Rajapaksa era. The question remains: Was Ranaweera simply following orders from Temple Trees (the official residence of the Prime Minister at the time), or was he an active participant in suppressing the truth?
Fast-forward to 2025, and Ranaweera has re-emerged, this time as a public security coordinating officer under the NPP government. While the NPP has garnered praise for its anti-corruption stance, Ranaweera’s appointment has cast a shadow over its credibility.
The timing is particularly sensitive, as international pressure mounts for a transparent investigation into Thajudeen’s death. Several human rights organizations are reportedly preparing to launch an independent inquiry, with plans to call witnesses in foreign jurisdictions. These efforts could force the Sri Lankan government to revisit the case—or face international backlash.
So why has Ranaweera been given such a sensitive position in public security? Is this an oversight by the NPP government, or is there a more calculated motive at play?
1. A Genuine Mistake by the NPP
The most charitable interpretation is that the NPP government was unaware of Ranaweera’s controversial past. In its haste to staff key positions with experienced officials, it may have overlooked his involvement in the Thajudeen case.
2. A Strategic Move by the Rajapaksa Network
A more cynical theory posits that Ranaweera’s appointment is part of a long game by the Rajapaksa family to protect their interests. By embedding a loyalist within the NPP government, they could ensure that any investigation into Thajudeen’s death is derailed from the inside.
3. Ranaweera’s Redemption Narrative
Ranaweera himself has attempted to distance himself from the controversy, presenting himself as a “new man” with no ties to past scandals. His supporters argue that his reappointment should be viewed as a second chance to serve the country. Critics, however, are not buying it.
Ranaweera’s new role raises several questions about the integrity of the ongoing investigation into Thajudeen’s death:
Will Ranaweera Influence the Inquiry?
As a coordinating officer in public security, Ranaweera wields significant influence. If he has any lingering loyalty to the Rajapaksas, there is a real risk that he could use his position to obstruct the investigation.
Will the NPP Government Act?
The NPP has built its reputation on transparency and accountability. Allowing Ranaweera to remain in his position without addressing public concerns could undermine this image.
Will International Pressure Force Action?
With foreign governments and organizations watching closely, the NPP may have no choice but to revisit Ranaweera’s past and reassess his suitability for the role.
The renewed interest in Thajudeen’s case isn’t just local—it’s global. Reports indicate that witnesses will soon testify in foreign jurisdictions, potentially implicating high-profile Sri Lankan figures, including members of the Rajapaksa family.
If these investigations proceed, they could force the Sri Lankan government to either open a public inquiry or face diplomatic consequences. Ranaweera’s involvement in the case would undoubtedly come under scrutiny, as would the NPP’s decision to appoint him to a key position.
Social media and activist circles have been abuzz with criticism of Ranaweera’s appointment. Many are demanding answers from the NPP government, accusing it of hypocrisy and complacency.
“Lalinda Ranaweera’s hands are stained with the blood of Thajudeen and countless others,” one activist tweeted. “How can the NPP claim to stand for justice while giving him a seat at the table?”
Others have called for a public inquiry, not just into Thajudeen’s death, but into all cases of state-sponsored violence and cover-ups during the Rajapaksa era.
The NPP government faces a critical choice:
1. Remove Ranaweera from Office
This would send a strong message that the NPP is serious about accountability and justice.
2. Launch a Full Inquiry into Thajudeen’s Death
Revisiting the case could provide closure for Thajudeen’s family and restore public faith in the justice system.
3. Address Public Concerns Transparently
The NPP must communicate openly about why Ranaweera was appointed and what steps are being taken to ensure his past does not interfere with his current duties.
Lalinda Ranaweera’s return to public office has reignited a debate about justice, accountability, and the lingering shadows of Sri Lanka’s turbulent past. Whether he is an unwitting pawn or a willing participant in a broader scheme, one thing is clear: His role in the Thajudeen case cannot be ignored.
For the NPP, this is a test of its commitment to transparency and reform. For the public, it is a reminder that justice delayed is justice denied. And for Ranaweera, it is a reckoning long overdue.
---------------------------
by (2025-01-21 16:57:35)
Read 12954 Times
Leave a Reply
0 discussion on this news